4.4 Article

Modeling optical fluence and diffuse reflectance distribution in normal and cancerous breast tissues exposed to planar and Gaussian NIR beam shapes using Monte Carlo simulation

期刊

LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03758-6

关键词

Diffuse reflectance; Fluence rate; NIR laser; Tissue optical parameters; Beam shaping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, Monte Carlo simulation is used to study light propagation in normal and cancerous breast tissues after irradiation with different laser beam shapes. The results show differences in diffuse reflectance and optical fluence distribution between normal and tumor tissues at different laser wavelengths and beam shapes. Visual representations of these distributions can offer a secure visual route for biological diagnostics.
Precise knowledge about light propagation in biological tissues is necessary for accurate diagnostics and effective therapies utilizing optical technologies. In the current paper, the Monte Carlo simulation is applied to study light dispersion in normal and cancerous breast after irradiating to different laser beam shapes. Two distinct laser wavelengths (800-1100 nm) with planar and Gaussian shapes were employed. The spatially resolved steady-state diffuse reflectance of normal tissue and tumor was investigated using Monte Carlo simulation method via MCML and MCXLAB computations. The diffusion equation was solved to simulate the fluence rate at the tissue surface based on the optical parameter values (i.e., scattering and absorption coefficients). The results confirm differences in diffuse reflectance and optical fluence distribution between the normal and tumor tissues at each wavelength. Tissue optical parameters and the utilized laser beam shape control the distribution of the fluence rate within tissues. Therefore, offering visual representations of these distributions can provide a secure visual route for biological diagnostics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据