Ethics Considerations in Laws Restricting Incapacitated Patients' Access to ECT

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a safe and effective treatment used for numerous psychiatric con-ditions. While many patients for whom ECT is indicated are able to give voluntary informed con-sent, some lack decision-making capacity (DMC), at least temporarily. Case reports from numerous countries involving ECT for patients who lack DMC indicate overall positive outcomes and high patient satisfaction with results comparable with those of consenting patients; some patients regain DMC with ECT. Laws and regulations pertaining to ECT vary widely around the world and across the United States. Many United States jurisdictions over-regulate ECT relative to other interventions with comparable risks and potential benefits. While laws restricting whether and under what cir-cumstances patients who lack DMC may receive ECT likely are aimed at protecting incapacitated persons, such laws sometimes undermine important ethics obligations and should be re-evaluated.J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 51:47-55, 2023. DOI:10.29158/JAAPL.220029-21

Automated summary

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a safe and effective treatment used for various psychiatric conditions. Some patients lack decision-making capacity and case reports indicate positive outcomes and high patient satisfaction. Laws and regulations pertaining to ECT vary worldwide and over-regulation in the United States should be re-evaluated.