4.6 Article

One-step removal of hexavalent chromium in wide pH range using thiourea dioxide: the role of reactive species

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 13, 期 16, 页码 10693-10702

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ra00520h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a single thiourea dioxide (TD) and two-components thiourea dioxide/ethanolamine (MEA) were used as green reducing agents for the efficient removal of Cr(VI) in a wide pH range. MEA promoted the generation of an active isomeride of TD by changing the equilibrium position of the reversible reaction. The experimental results demonstrated that TD/MEA was effective for the removal of Cr(VI) and had potential industrial application.
One-step removal of hexavalent chromium in a wide pH range is of great significance. In this paper, a single thiourea dioxide (TD) and two-components thiourea dioxide/ethanolamine (MEA) were used as a green reducing agent for the efficient removal of Cr(vi), respectively. The reduction of Cr(vi) and the precipitation of Cr(iii) were carried out simultaneously under this reaction system. The experimental results proved that TD was activated by amine exchange reaction with MEA. In other words, MEA promoted the generation of an active isomeride of TD by changing the equilibrium position of the reversible reaction. After adding MEA, the removal rate of Cr(vi) and total Cr could reach industrial water discharge standards in a wide pH range of 8-12. The change of pH, reduction potential and the decomposition rate of TD were investigated in the reaction processes. Meanwhile, reductive and oxidative reactive species were produced simultaneously during this reaction process. Further, oxidative reactive species (O-2(-) and O-1(2)) were beneficial for the decomplexation of Cr(iii) complexes and the formation of Cr(iii) precipitation. The experimental results also demonstrated that TD/MEA was effective in practical industrial wastewater. Hence this reaction system has a significant industrial application prospect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据