4.6 Article

Diagnostics of nonergodic extended states and many body localization proximity effect through real-space and Fock-space excitations

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 107, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.115155

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We provide real-space and Fock-space characterizations of ergodic, nonergodic extended (NEE) and many-body localized (MBL) phases in an interacting quasiperiodic system. We show that a mobility edge in the single-particle excitations survives even in the presence of interaction in the NEE phase, while all single-particle excitations get localized in the MBL phase. We give complementary insights into the distinction of the NEE states from the ergodic and MBL states by computing local FS self-energies and decay length associated.
We provide real-space and Fock-space (FS) characterizations of ergodic, nonergodic extended (NEE) and many-body localized (MBL) phases in an interacting quasiperiodic system, namely, the generalized Aubry-Andre-Harper model, which possesses a mobility edge in the noninteracting limit. We show that a mobility edge in the single-particle (SP) excitations survives even in the presence of interaction in the NEE phase. In contrast, all single-particle excitations get localized in the MBL phase due to the MBL proximity effect. We give complementary insights into the distinction of the NEE states from the ergodic and MBL states by computing local FS self-energies and decay length associated, respectively, with the local and the nonlocal FS propagators. Based on a finite-size scaling analysis of the typical local self-energy across the NEE to ergodic transition, we show that MBL and NEE states exhibit qualitatively similar multifractal character. However, we find that the NEE and MBL states can be distinguished in terms of the distribution of local self-energy and the decay of the nonlocal propagator in the FS, whereas the typical local FS self-energy cannot tell them apart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据