4.7 Article

How dirt cones form on glaciers: Field observation, laboratory experiments, and modeling

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.107.034905

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dirt cones are meter-scale structures formed by ice cones covered with a layer of debris. We conducted field observations, laboratory experiments, and numerical simulations to understand the formation process. We found that the insulating properties of the debris layer reduce ice melting, leading to differential ablation and the formation of conical shapes. The cones reach a steady state when the insulation compensates for the heat flux. Our findings allowed us to develop a model that accurately reproduces field observations and experimental results.
Dirt cones are meter-scale structures encountered at the surface of glaciers, which consist of ice cones covered by a thin layer of ashes, sand, or gravel, and which form naturally from an initial patch of debris. In this article, we report field observations of cone formation in the French Alps, laboratory-scale experiments reproducing these structures in a controlled environment, and two-dimensional discrete-element-method-finite-element-method numerical simulations coupling the grain mechanics and thermal effects. We show that cone formation originates from the insulating properties of the granular layer, which reduces ice melting underneath as compared to bare ice melting. This differential ablation deforms the ice surface and induces a quasistatic flow of grains that leads to a conic shape, as the thermal length become small compared to the structure size. The cone grows until it reaches a steady state in which the insulation provided by the dirt layer exactly compensates for the heat flux coming from the increased external surface of the structure. These results allowed us to identify the key physical mechanisms at play and to develop a model able to quantitatively reproduce the various field observations and experimental findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据