4.6 Article

Predicting liquid-liquid phase separation in ternary organic-organic-water mixtures

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 16, 页码 11121-11129

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3cp00691c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) affects the water uptake of aerosol particles in the atmosphere through Kelvin and Raoult effects. This study used a computational method, COSMO-RS, to investigate LLPS in ternary mixtures containing water and two organic compounds. The computations found LLPS in all of the studied mixtures, due to the limited solubility of the hydrophobic POA proxies in water. Experimental observations, however, did not observe the additional three-phase states predicted by the computations, likely due to the lower relative humidity used in the experiments.
Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) affects the water uptake of aerosol particles in the atmosphere through Kelvin and Raoult effects. This study investigates LLPS in ternary mixtures containing water and two organic compounds, using a conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS). COSMO-RS found LLPS in all of the studied mixtures containing water and proxies for primary and secondary organic aerosol (POA and SOA, respectively), due to the limited solubility of the hydrophobic POA proxies in water. The computations predict additional three-phase states in some of the SOA-POA-water mixtures at relative humidity (RH) close to 100%, which was not observed in experiments, likely due to the relatively low RH (90%) used in the experiments. A computational method, such as COSMO-RS, allows for the estimation of new information on mixing states and mixtures that cannot be accessed experimentally. Comparison with experiments can also provide insight into which types of compounds may be present in SOA. Additionally, the possibility of LLPS can be assessed faster with rough estimates rather than by computing the whole phase diagram.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据