4.6 Article

Lattice dynamics and in-plane antiferromagnetism in MnxZn1-xPS3 across the entire composition range

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 107, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.104415

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alloyed MnxZn1-xPS3 samples were grown and studied using Raman spectroscopy and magnetic measurements. The results showed that the alloy retains antiferromagnetism at x = 0.3 and identified the Raman signatures of a magnetic transition. Spin-phonon coupling and lattice-dynamical calculations were used to explain these signatures. Comparisons with other compounds confirmed the occurrence of a second-order Jahn-Teller effect in ZnPS3 and Zn-rich MnxZn1-xPS3.
Alloyed MnxZn1-xPS3 samples have been grown covering the whole compositional range and studied by means of Raman spectroscopy at temperatures from 4 to 850 K. Our results, supported by superconducting quantum interference device magnetic measurements, allowed us, on one hand, to complete the magnetic phase diagram of MnxZn1-xPS3 and establish x 0.3 as the composition at which the alloy retains antiferromagnetism and, on the other hand, to identify the Raman signatures indicative of a magnetic transition. The origin of these Raman signatures is discussed in terms of spin-phonon coupling, resulting in the appearance of low-and high -frequency phonon modes. For the alloy, an assignation of the first-and second-order modes is provided with the aid of first-principles lattice-dynamical calculations. The compositional dependence of all phonon modes is described, and the presence of zone-folded modes is shown to take place for the alloy. Finally, a comparison of the Raman spectra of ZnPS3 to other compounds of the transition metal phosphorus trisulfide family allowed us to conclude that low-frequency phonon peaks exhibit an abnormally large broadening. This is consistent with previous claims on the occurrence of a second-order Jahn-Teller effect that takes place for ZnPS3 and Zn-rich MnxZn1-xPS3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据