4.6 Article

All sprayed fluorine-free membrane electrode assembly for low-platinum and low-humidity proton exchange membrane fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 11, 期 16, 页码 9002-9008

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ta00603d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reducing catalyst loading and humidity dependence is important for commercializing PEMFCs. The use of fluorine-free hydrocarbon membranes instead of perfluorinated sulfonic-acid PEMs can reduce manufacturing costs. The AS-MEA, fabricated using an all spraying method, shows superior performance compared to the CCS-MEA, particularly at low humidity and catalyst loading, and also exhibits good durability.
Reducing the platinum catalyst loading and humidity dependence of membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) is highly desirable for commercializing proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Meanwhile, replacing the perfluorinated sulfonic-acid PEMs with fluorine-free hydrocarbon membranes can reduce manufacturing costs. We present an all spraying (AS) method to fabricate a fluorine-free hydrocarbon-based MEA (AS-MEA). Such an MEA achieves a much higher H-2/O-2 fuel cell performance than the conventional catalyst-coated substrate MEA (CCS-MEA). The peak power density is 1.6 W cm(-2) for the AS-MEA vs. 1.2 W cm(-2) for the CCS-MEA with 100% relative humidity (RH) and 0.1/0.1 L per min H-2/O-2 and 0.1 MPa backpressure gas feeds. More importantly, the performance superiority is particularly prominent at low RH and catalyst loading. The AS-MEA achieves a competitive peak power density of 0.6 W cm(-2) at 40% RH with a low Pt loading of 0.1 mg cm(-2), which is more than 3-fold that of the CCS-MEA. Equivalent-circuits-based analyses of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy show that the exceptional performance arises from the tightly integrated PEM-catalyst layer boundary, as confirmed by the cross-sectional morphological investigations. Moreover, the AS-MEA shows appreciable in situ durability during a 100 h accelerated stress test.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据