The Meat Ambivalence Questionnaire: Assessing Domain-Specific Meat-Related Conflict in Omnivores and Veg*ans

People are increasingly concerned about how meat affects the environment, human health, and animal welfare, yet eating and enjoying meat remains a norm. Unsurprisingly, many people are ambivalent about meat-evaluating it as both positive and negative. Here, we propose that meat-related conflict is multidimensional and depends on people's dietary group: Omnivores' felt ambivalence relates to multiple negative associations that oppose a predominantly positive attitude towards meat, and veg*ans' ambivalence relates to various positive associations that oppose a predominantly negative attitude. A qualitative study (N = 235; German) revealed that omnivores and veg*ans experience meat-related ambivalence due to associations with animals, sociability, sustainability, health, and sensory experiences. To quantify felt ambivalence in these domains, we developed the Meat Ambivalence Questionnaire (MAQ). We validated the MAQ in four pre-registered studies using self-report and behavioral data (N = 3,485; German, UK, representative US). Both omnivores and veg*ans reported meat-related ambivalence, but with differences across domains and their consequences for meat consumption. Specifically, ambivalence was associated with less meat consumption in omnivores (especially sensory-/animal-based ambivalence) and more meat consumption in veg*ans (especially sensory-/socially-based ambivalence). Network analyses shed further light on the nomological net of the MAQ while controlling for a comprehensive set of determinants of meat consumption. By introducing the MAQ, we hope to provide researchers with a tool to better understand how ambivalence accompanies behavior change and maintenance.

Automated summary

People are increasingly concerned about the impact of meat on the environment, human health, and animal welfare, but eating meat is still considered a norm. A study found that omnivores and vegetarians/vegans experience ambivalence towards meat due to different associations, leading to varying effects on meat consumption. A Meat Ambivalence Questionnaire (MAQ) was developed and validated to help researchers understand the relationship between ambivalence and behavior change/maintenance.