4.7 Article

Ensemble Alignment Subspace Adaptation Method for Cross-Scene Classification

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2023.3256348

关键词

Ensemble learning; Hyperspectral imaging; Multiprotocol label switching; Geoscience and remote sensing; Bagging; Training; Buildings; Cross-scene classification; domain adaptive (DA); ensemble learning; hyperspectral; transfer learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this letter, an ensemble alignment subspace adaptation (EASA) method is proposed for cross-scene classification. It addresses the problem of foreign objects in the same spectrum and different spectra by combining ensemble learning with domain adaptive algorithm. The proposed algorithm reduces uncertainty and randomness of subspace projections, and achieves a significant accuracy improvement compared to traditional machine learning and domain adaptation methods as shown in experimental results on two real datasets.
An ensemble alignment subspace adaptation (EASA) method is proposed in this letter for the cross-scene classification. It can settle the problem of both foreign objects in the same spectrum and different spectra. The algorithm combines the idea of ensemble learning with the domain adaptive (DA) algorithm. Considering the sample imbalance problem of the original data (OD), the source data (SD) are obtained by multiple random sampling of OD according to certain rules and used as input. Then, geometric alignment and statistical alignment of SD and target data (TD) are performed to build a communal subspace, followed by the classification of TD. The classification labels are finally ensembled by counting the multiple classification results with retaining valid information. This technique can reduce the uncertainty and randomness of generating subspace projections. The experimental results on two real datasets show that the proposed algorithm has a terrific accuracy improvement compared with the traditional machine learning and DA methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据