4.4 Article

Cold temperature extends longevity and prevents disease-related protein aggregation through PA28γ-induced proteasomes

期刊

NATURE AGING
卷 3, 期 5, 页码 546-+

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43587-023-00383-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Moderate cold temperature extends lifespan by eliminating protein aggregation through PSME3-activated proteasomes. This mechanism is effective in both C. elegans and human cells, and it can ameliorate age-related deficits in protein degradation and reduce neurodegeneration.
Moderate cold temperature extends lifespan, but the mechanisms involved are not fully understood. Here, the authors show that moderate cold temperature eliminates aggregation-prone proteins through PSME3-activated proteasomes in both C. elegans and human cells. Aging is a primary risk factor for neurodegenerative disorders that involve protein aggregation. Because lowering body temperature is one of the most effective mechanisms to extend longevity in both poikilotherms and homeotherms, a better understanding of cold-induced changes can lead to converging modifiers of pathological protein aggregation. Here, we find that cold temperature (15 degrees C) selectively induces the trypsin-like activity of the proteasome in Caenorhabditis elegans through PSME-3, the worm orthologue of human PA28 gamma/PSME3. This proteasome activator is required for cold-induced longevity and ameliorates age-related deficits in protein degradation. Moreover, cold-induced PA28 gamma/PSME-3 diminishes protein aggregation in C. elegans models of age-related diseases such as Huntington's and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Notably, exposure of human cells to moderate cold temperature (36 degrees C) also activates trypsin-like activity through PA28 gamma/PSME3, reducing disease-related protein aggregation and neurodegeneration. Together, our findings reveal a beneficial role of cold temperature that crosses evolutionary boundaries with potential implications for multi-disease prevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据