4.7 Article

Linear Functionality Equivalence Attack Against Deep Neural Network Watermarks and a Defense Method by Neuron Mapping

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2023.3259881

关键词

Watermarking; Glass box; Neurons; Feature extraction; Deep learning; Closed box; Biological neural networks; Artificial intelligence security; deep neural network watermarking; functionality equivalence attack

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces the linear functionality equivalence attack, which can adapt to different network architectures without requiring knowledge of either the watermark or data. We also propose NeuronMap, a framework that can efficiently neutralize linear functionality equivalence attacks and enhance the robustness of existing white-box watermarks.
As an ownership verification technique for deep neural networks, the white-box neural network watermark is being challenged by the functionality equivalence attack. By leveraging the structural symmetry within a deep neural network and manipulating the parameters accordingly, an adversary can invalidate almost all white-box watermarks without affecting the network's performance. This paper introduces the linear functionality equivalence attack, which can adapt to different network architectures without requiring knowledge of either the watermark or data. We also propose NeuronMap, a framework that can efficiently neutralize linear functionality equivalence attacks and can be easily combined with existing white-box watermarks to enhance their robustness. Experiments conducted on several deep neural networks and state-of-the-art white-box watermarking schemes have demonstrated not only the destructive power of linear functionality equivalence attacks but also the defense capability of NeuronMap. Our result shows that the threat of basic linear functionality equivalence attacks against deep neural network watermarks can be effectively solved using NeuronMap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据