4.7 Review

A survey of multi-criteria decision-making techniques for green logistics and low-carbon transportation systems

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 20, 页码 57279-57301

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26577-2

关键词

Sustainability; Green manufacturing; Low-carbon transportation; Multi-criteria decision-making; Review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the growing severity of environmental problems, low-carbon development has become an inevitable choice. The complexity of low-carbon green sustainable development, influenced by various factors, poses challenges for decision-makers. This paper provides a systematic review and analysis of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques in the field of low-carbon transport and green logistics, filling the gap in existing literature. Future directions for MCDM techniques in these areas are also presented.
With the increasing severity of environmental problems, low-carbon development has become an inevitable choice. Nowadays, low-carbon green sustainable development is influenced by a variety of factors such as social, environmental, technological, and economic development levels, making its development complex, which in turn imposes challenges on decision-makers. In this context, the application of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) in different areas of sustainable development engineering has become a hot topic. Although many reviews of MCDM techniques already exist, there is a lack of holistic review efforts on MCDM in the field of low-carbon transport and green logistics. Considering these shortcomings in the state of the art, this paper systematically reviews more than 190 papers from 2010 to 2022, constructs a general structure of MCDM techniques for this research topic, provides a comprehensive review and analysis of it, and clarifies the current practices. Furthermore, future directions for the development of MCDM techniques for green logistics and low-carbon transportation systems are presented as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据