4.6 Article

Prevalence of Disordered Eating and Its Associated Factors From a Socioecological Approach Among a Sample of Spanish Adolescents: The EHDLA Study

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605820

关键词

eating disorders; lifestyle; correlates; youths; obesity; overweight; sleep; immigrant status

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of disordered eating among Spanish adolescents in the Valle de Ricote region and identify associated factors. The study found that the prevalence of disordered eating was 30.1%, and it was associated with female sex, immigrant status, and excess weight. Additionally, each additional hour of sleep was found to lower the odds of having disordered eating.
Objectives: The aim of this study was twofold: a) to establish the prevalence of adolescents with disordered eating and b) to determine the factors associated with this prevalence in a sample of Spanish adolescents from the Valle de Ricote (Region of Murcia, Spain).Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 730 adolescents (56.2% girls) from the EHDLA study. To determine the prevalence of disordered eating, the Sick, Control, One stone, Fat, Food (SCOFF) questionnaire was used. A socioecological approach was used to identify individual-, interpersonal-, or organizational-level factors associated with disordered eating.Results: The prevalence of disordered eating was 30.1%. This condition was associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.81-3.73), immigrant status (OR = 2.22; 95% CI, 1.51-3.25), or excess weight (OR = 2.74; 95% CI, 1.93-3.89). Furthermore, for each additional hour slept, lower odds of having disordered eating were found (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98).Discussion: Almost one-third of the sample of Spanish adolescents analyzed reported disordered eating. Female sex, immigrant status and excess weight are individual aspects that seem to be related to disordered eating among Spanish adolescents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据