The impact of solution vs. slurry vs. mechanochemical syntheses upon the sorption performance of a 2D switching coordination network

The selection and optimization of synthesis routes for porous metal-organic materials are critical for their large-scale manufacture but remain largely underexplored. In this study, we compare mechanochemistry vs. slurry vs. solution methods for the synthesis of a 1D chain coordination polymer {[Co(bpy)(NCS)(2)(H2O)(2)]center dot bpy}(n) (chn-1-Co-NCS-H2O) that is an intermediate to the 2D switching coordination network [Co(bpy)(2)(NCS)(2)](n), sql-1-Co-NCS (1 = bpy = 4,4 '-bipyridine). Although neat mechanosynthesis using Co(NCS)(2) and bpy as the starting materials failed, both water slurry and water-assisted mechanochemical syntheses afforded the desired intermediate, chn-1-Co-NCS-H2O, in high yield. Nevertheless, the resulting sql-1-Co-NCS products were observed to exhibit different CO2 sorption profiles depending on the synthesis methods used to prepare chn-1-Co-NCS-H2O. This study reveals that water can play an important role in mechanosynthesis, not only by inducing and accelerating the reaction process, but also by enhancing product quality in a manner that is not readily detectable by PXRD.

Automated summary

In this study, the selection and optimization of synthesis routes for porous metal-organic materials were compared. Mechanochemistry, slurry, and solution methods were assessed for the synthesis of a 1D chain coordination polymer, and it was found that both water slurry and water-assisted mechanochemical syntheses were successful in yielding the desired intermediate. However, the resulting products exhibited different CO2 sorption profiles depending on the synthesis methods used.