4.7 Article

Response of Mid-Rotation Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Physiology and Productivity to Sustained, Moderate Drought on the Western Edge of the Range

期刊

FORESTS
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f7090203

关键词

leaf biomass; leaf gas exchange; Pinus taeda; sustained drought; throughfall exclusion; water use

类别

资金

  1. Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation Project (PINEMAP), a Coordinated Agriculture Project - United States Department of Agriculture-National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2011-68002-30185]
  2. McIntire-Stennis project [OKLO 2929]
  3. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station
  4. Office Of The Director
  5. Office of Integrative Activities [1301789] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The productivity of the approximately 11 million ha of loblolly pine plantations in the southeastern USA could be threatened by decreased water availability in a future climate. To determine the effects of sustained drought on leaf gas exchange, whole-tree water use, and individual tree growth, we examined the response of loblolly pine trees to 100% throughfall exclusion cumulatively spanning the sixth and seventh growing seasons of a plantation in southeastern Oklahoma. Throughfall exclusion reduced volumetric soil water content for 0-12 cm soil depth from 10.8% to 4.8% and for 12-45 cm soil depth from 24.2% to 15.6%. Compared to ambient throughfall trees, leaf water potential of the throughfall exclusion trees became more negative, -0.9 MPa vs. -1.3 MPa for predawn measurements and -1.5 MPa vs. -1.9 MPa for midday measurements. Throughfall exclusion did not significantly reduce leaf gas exchange or tree water use. However, throughfall exclusion significantly reduced leaf biomass by 21% and stem volume growth by 23%. These results indicate that sustained drought may cause downward shifts in leaf quantity to conserve water rather than reducing leaf-level water use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据