4.7 Article

Role of radiomic analysis of [F-18]fluoromethylcholine PET/CT in predicting biochemical recurrence in a cohort of intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients at initial staging

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09642-9

关键词

Prostatic neoplasms; Artificial intelligence; Fluorocholine; Positron emission tomography computed tomography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiomic analysis can assist in predicting biochemical recurrence in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients. Combining clinical data with radiomic features improves the accuracy of prediction.
AimTo study the feasibility of radiomic analysis of baseline [F-18]fluoromethylcholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the prediction of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in a cohort of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients.Material and methodsSeventy-four patients were prospectively collected. We analyzed three prostate gland (PG) segmentations (i.e., PG(whole): whole PG; PG(41%): prostate having standardized uptake value - SUV > 0.41*SUVmax; PG(2.5): prostate having SUV > 2.5) together with three SUV discretization steps (i.e., 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6). For each segmentation/discretization step, we trained a logistic regression model to predict BCR using radiomic and/or clinical features.ResultsThe median baseline prostate-specific antigen was 11 ng/mL, the Gleason score was > 7 for 54% of patients, and the clinical stage was T1/T2 for 89% and T3 for 9% of patients. The baseline clinical model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.73. Performances improved when clinical data were combined with radiomic features, in particular for PG(2.5) and 0.4 discretization, for which the median test AUC was 0.78.ConclusionRadiomics reinforces clinical parameters in predicting BCR in intermediate and high-risk PCa patients. These first data strongly encourage further investigations on the use of radiomic analysis to identify patients at risk of BCR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据