4.4 Article

Negative predictive value of PSMA PET scan for lymph node staging in patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03595-0

关键词

PSMA PET scan; Robotic radical prostatectomy; Lymph node metastasis; Prostate cancer; Lymph node dissection; PET scan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the negative predictive value of PSMA PET scan for lymph node staging in patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. The overall negative predictive value of PSMA PET scan was found to be 71.6%. However, further analysis based on risk stratification showed that the negative predictive value varied among different risk groups, with values of 58.02%, 92.7%, and 90% for high, intermediate, and low-risk patients, respectively.
PurposeTo assess the negative predictive value of PSMA PET scan for lymph node staging in patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis of patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection and had a preoperative negative PSMA PET scan for metastasis was performed. The documented pre-operative variables studied included age, BMI, PSA at diagnosis, Gleason score, and biopsy ISUP grades. Patients were categorised as low, intermediate and high risk according to the D Amico classification. The post-op variables included were number of lymph nodes harvested, number of positive nodes, positivity rate, size of the node metastasis, T staging and ISUP grading.ResultsThe overall negative predictive value of PSMA PET scan was 71.6%. Further sub-classification according to risk stratification demonstrated a NPV of 58.02%, 92.7% and 90% for high, intermediate and low risk, respectively.ConclusionPelvic lymph node dissection cannot be excluded based on a negative preop PSMA PET/CT scan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据