4.6 Article

Theory of multidimensional quantum capacitance and its application to spin and charge discrimination in quantum dot arrays

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 107, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.155411

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quantum capacitance of a few-particle system capacitively coupled to a metal gate can be used to distinguish different quantum states. This concept is extended to multiple voltages by introducing the quantum capacitance matrix. By using this matrix formalism, the dependence of the quantum capacitance on voltage oscillations in the parameter space can be determined, and the optimal combination of gate voltages can be identified. As an application, this approach is used to optimize the discrimination between states with different particle numbers and/or total spins in a quantum dot array.
Quantum states of a few-particle system capacitively coupled to a metal gate can be discriminated by measuring the quantum capacitance, which can be identified with the second derivative of the system energy with respect to the gate voltage. This approach is here generalized to the multivoltage case, through the introduction of the quantum capacitance matrix. The matrix formalism allows us to determine the dependence of the quantum capacitance on the direction of the voltage oscillations in the parameter space and to identify the optimal combination of gate voltages. As a representative example, this approach is applied to the case of a quantum dot array, described in terms of a Hubbard model. Here, we first identify the potentially relevant regions in the multidimensional voltage space with the boundaries between charge stability regions, determined within a semiclassical approach. Then, we quantitatively characterize such boundaries by means of the quantum capacitance matrix. Altogether, this provides a procedure for optimizing the discrimination between states with different particle numbers and/or total spins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据