4.6 Article

Electrical properties of amorphous Zn-Sn-O thin films depending on composition and post-deposition annealing temperature near crystallization temperature

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 11, 期 24, 页码 8254-8262

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2tc05090k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the crystallization and electrical properties of atomic layer deposited Zn-Sn-O (ZTO) thin films. It was found that the highest crystallization temperature was similar to 700 degrees C in Sn 42-66 at%, and the best device performance was observed at Sn 42 at%. The optimal Sn concentration to provide thermal stability and good device performance of the ZTO thin film was approximately 42 at%.
This study investigated the crystallization and electrical properties of atomic layer deposited Zn-Sn-O (ZTO) thin films. Also, the optimum composition ratio that can provide thermal stability and good device performance for the ZTO thin film through high-temperature annealing was examined. As a result, it was confirmed that the highest crystallization temperature was similar to 700 degrees C in Sn 42-66 at%, and the best device performance was observed at Sn 42 at%. This conclusion is attributed to the difference in the shallow donor-level energy distribution of the Sn-related and the Zn-related oxygen vacancies. Furthermore, the higher the annealing temperature below the crystallization temperature, the better the mobility, presumed to be caused by decreased defect density. However, a sudden decrease in device performance was observed in the region above the crystallization temperature due to the formation of grain boundaries and related defects. Therefore, the optimal Sn concentration to provide thermal stability and good device performance of the ZTO thin film was approximately 42 at%, where promising device performances were achieved, including a carrier mobility of 25.5 cm(2) V-1 s(-1), a subthreshold swing of 0.30 V decade(-1), and a threshold voltage of -0.52 V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据