4.7 Article

Purification and activity evaluation of novel anti-inflammatory peptides from pearl oyster (Pinctada martensii) hydrolysates

期刊

FOOD & FUNCTION
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 4242-4253

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2fo04046h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pearl oyster meat, a by-product of pearl production, was found to have potential anti-inflammatory activity in this study. Three novel anti-inflammatory peptides were identified and found to effectively bind to key regions in the COX-2 active site. These peptides also regulated the release of inflammatory mediators from macrophages, showing great anti-inflammatory activity. This study provides a theoretical reference for the development of functional foods or nutritional supplements with natural anti-inflammatory effects.
Pearl oyster meat, a by-product of pearl production, is rich in protein, but has a low utilization rate. Our previous study showed that pearl oyster meat hydrolysates have potential anti-inflammatory activity. In this study, highly active peptides from pearl oyster meat hydrolysates were purified, identified, and extracted, and their anti-inflammatory activity was further investigated. A total of 206 peptides were identified, and three novel anti-inflammatory peptides, TWP (402.1903 Da), TAMY (484.1992 Da) and FPGA (390.1903 Da), were screened by molecular docking. The molecular docking results showed that TWP, TAMY and FPGA can bind to key regions in the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) active site. Furthermore, the three anti-inflammatory peptides can effectively regulate the release of inflammatory mediators from RAW264.7 macrophages by reducing the levels of nitric oxide (NO) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF-alpha, IL-6 and IL-1 beta), and increasing the production of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, showing great anti-inflammatory activity. This study provides a new theoretical reference for the development of functional foods or nutritional supplements with natural anti-inflammatory effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据