4.2 Article

Mechanism of ammonia synthesis on Fe3Mo3N

期刊

FARADAY DISCUSSIONS
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 77-96

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2fd00148a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the ammonia synthesis mechanisms in Fe3Mo3N and Co3Mo3N catalysts. The results show that surface lattice N vacancies in Fe3Mo3N can promote NH3 synthesis, and Fe3Mo3N exhibits higher N-2 activation ability. The calculations suggest that both Fe3Mo3N and Co3Mo3N can achieve ammonia synthesis through the associative Mars van Krevelen mechanism, especially for initial hydrogenation processes, by providing a less energy-demanding pathway.
Ammonia (NH3) synthesis is an essential yet energy-demanding industrial process. Hence, there is a need to develop NH3 synthesis catalysts that are highly active under milder conditions. Metal nitrides are promising candidates, with the ?-carbide Co3Mo3N having been found to be more active than the industrial Fe-based catalyst. The isostructural Fe3Mo3N catalyst has also been identified as highly active for NH3 synthesis. In the present work, we investigate the catalytic ammonia synthesis mechanisms in Fe3Mo3N, which we compare and contrast with the previously studied Co3Mo3N. We apply plane-wave density functional theory (DFT) to investigate surface N vacancy formation in Fe3Mo3N, and two distinct ammonia synthesis mechanisms. The calculations reveal that whilst N vacancy formation on Fe3Mo3N is more thermodynamically demanding than for Co3Mo3N, the formation energies are comparable, suggesting that surface lattice N vacancies in Fe3Mo3N could facilitate NH3 synthesis. N-2 activation was found to be enhanced on Fe3Mo3N compared to Co3Mo3N, for adsorption both at and adjacent to the vacancy. The calculated activation barriers suggest that, as for Co3Mo3N, the associative Mars van Krevelen mechanism affords a much less energy-demanding pathway for ammonia synthesis, especially for initial hydrogenation processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据