4.6 Article

Seven new triterpenoid saponins from Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus and the inhibition of high-glucose induced SV40 MES 13 cells

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 18, 页码 8776-8784

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2nj06368a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a phytochemical investigation of Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch) Bge. var. mongholicus (Bge) Hsiao ethanol extract led to the identification of seven new triterpenoid saponins, astralanosaponins F-L, along with fifteen known compounds. The structures of these compounds were determined through 1D-NMR and 2D-NMR spectroscopy and compared with similar compounds reported previously. The absolute configuration of sugar was determined using GC-MS. The inhibitory effects of these compounds on high glucose-induced SV40 MES 13 cells were evaluated using the CCK-8 assay, and compound 19 showed significant inhibition with an IC50 value of 12.2 + 1.29 mM. Compounds 5 and 9 also displayed moderate inhibitory effects with IC50 values below 30 mM. The possible structure-activity relationships were preliminarily summarized.
A phytochemical study of the ethanol extract of Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch) Bge. var. mongholicus (Bge) Hsiao resulted in the isolation of seven new triterpenoid saponins, astralanosaponins F-L, together with fifteen known compounds (8-22). Structure analysis of these extracted compounds was performed using 1D-NMR and 2D-NMR spectroscopy, and their data were compared with those of similar compounds previously reported in the literature. The absolute configuration of sugar was determined using GC-MS. The cell viability of SV40 MES 13 cells induced by high glucose was tested using the CCK-8 assay. Compound 19 showed obvious inhibitory effects of the high-glucose induced SV40 MES 13 cells with IC50 values of 12.2 + 1.29 mM, while compounds 5 and 9 showed moderate inhibitory effects with IC50 less than 30 mM. Their possible structure-activity relationships were preliminarily summarized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据