4.6 Article

Two-dimensional Pd3(AsSe4)2 as a photocatalyst for the solar-driven oxygen evolution reaction: a first-principles study

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 13, 期 17, 页码 11742-11750

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ra00592e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between the structure and properties of materials is the core of material research. In this study, two-dimensional Pd-3(AsX4)(2) materials were explored using density functional theory based on first principles, and their properties as indirect semiconductors and their potential for photocatalysis and oxygen evolution were demonstrated.
The relationship between the structure and properties of materials is the core of material research. Bulk Pd-3(PS4)(2) materials have been successfully synthesized in the field of three-dimensional materials. After that, various studies on two-dimensional layered materials were conducted. Inspired by these successes, this work used density functional theory based on first principles to explore similar two-dimensional Pd-3(AsX4)(2), where X is S, Se, or Te belonging to the same group. Our findings demonstrate that the Pd-3(AsS4)(2) and Pd-3(AsSe4)(2) monolayers, with HSE06 band gaps of 2.37 and 1.36 eV, respectively, are indirect semiconductors. Additionally, their carrier mobilities [523.23 cm(2) s(-1) V-1 and 440.6 cm(2) s(-1) V-1] are also proved to be superior to MoS2 [similar to 200 cm(2) s(-1) V-1]. The optical calculations indicate that the Pd-3(AsSe4)(2) monolayer yields suitable valence band edge positions for the visible-light-driven water splitting reactions. More interestingly, at a low applied voltage of 0.14 V, Pd-3(AsSe4)(2) exhibits outstanding oxygen evolution reaction performance. In this study, the possible mechanism for the ability of Pd-3(AsSe4)(2) monolayer to promote photocatalysis and oxygen evolution was explained, which may pave the way for the practical design of further solar-driven high-quality water splitting photocatalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据