4.7 Article

The synergistic effect of epigallocatechin-3-gallate and quercetin co-loaded hydrogel beads on inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

FOOD & FUNCTION
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 4539-4551

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2fo04029h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Indicates the typical substances with synergistic effects, mainly used in the treatment of related diseases, but limited by their instability and low bioavailability. Therefore, researchers encapsulated these substances in hydrogel beads with sodium alginate and soybean protein isolate to improve their stability and bioavailability. The anti-inflammatory effect and molecular mechanism of action of these substances in inflammatory bowel disease were also investigated.
The synergistic effect of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (E) and quercetin (Q) enhances the therapeutic efficacy on related diseases; however, the instability and lower bioavailability of E and Q limited their application. Therefore, E and Q were co-encapsulated in hydrogel beads (H) with sodium alginate (SA) and soybean protein isolate (SPI) to improve their stability and bioavailability. The anti-inflammatory effect and molecular mechanism of action of E and Q co-loaded H in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were also investigated. The results showed that EQH-treated macrophages produced the lowest NO and TNF-alpha at 18.64 mu mol L-1 and 5855.25 ng mL(-1), respectively. The protein expression of p-NF kappa B-p65 was the lowest in EQH, indicating that EQH inhibits the activation of the pro-inflammatory NF-kappa B signaling pathway. The colon length of IBD model rats fed EH, QH, and EQH increased; histological analysis revealed intact layers of colonic epithelial cells with no observable tissue damage. The TNF-a and IL-1 beta levels in the plasma of the EQH-treated rats decreased, indicating the inhibition of the TLR4 and NF-kappa B signaling pathways, and Q's level in the colon was the highest at 0.04 mg mL(-1). This study provides a theoretical basis for the application of E and Q in IBD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据