4.7 Article

Label Distribution Learning by Maintaining Label Ranking Relation

期刊

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2021.3099294

关键词

Label distribution learning; label ranking; multi-label learning; learning with ambiguity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Label distribution learning (LDL) is a novel machine learning paradigm that quantitatively describes the relevance between labels and unknown instances, as well as the ranking relation between labels. However, existing LDL models only utilize the quantitative advantage and ignore the label ranking relation. Therefore, we propose a novel algorithm with a ranking loss function to address this issue, and introduce two popular ranking evaluation metrics to comprehensively evaluate LDL algorithms.
Label distribution learning (LDL) is a novel machine learning paradigm that can be seen as an extension of multi-label learning (MLL). Compared with MLL, the advantages of LDL are reflected in the following perspectives: (1) the label distribution gives the relevance description of each label to unknown instances in quantitative terms; (2) the distribution implicitly gives the relevance intensities relation of different labels to a particular instance in qualitative terms, i.e., the label ranking relation. All existing LDL models aim to fit the ground-truth label distribution by quantitatively minimizing the distance between distributions or maximizing the similarity between distributions, which only uses the first advantage of the label distribution but ignores the label ranking relation, which may lose some useful semantic information implied in the label distribution, thus reducing the performance of LDL. Therefore, we propose a novel algorithm to solve this problem by introducing the ranking loss function to LDL. In addition, in order to evaluate the LDL algorithms more comprehensively and verify that the ranking loss is beneficial for keeping the label ranking relation, we also introduce two popular ranking evaluation metrics for LDL. The experimental results on 13 real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of our method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据