4.4 Review

Dual effects of circRNA in thyroid and breast cancer

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03173-x

关键词

circRNA; Molecular mechanism; Cancer; Commonality and difference; Correlation impact

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CircRNA, a special non-coding RNA molecule, participates in the generation and progression of thyroid and breast cancer. Both cancers are hormonally influenced and share similar characteristics. However, there is a lack of clinical studies on the potential molecular mechanisms affecting prognosis, despite the use of targeted anti-tumor drugs with tumor markers in clinical settings.
CircRNA, the latest research hotspot in the field of RNA, is a special non-coding RNA molecule, which is unable to encode proteins and bind polyribosomes. As a regulatory molecule, circRNA participates in cancer cell generation and progression mainly through the mechanism of competitive endogenous RNA. In numerous regulated cancer organs, the thyroid and breast are both endocrine organs, and both are regulated by the hypothalamic pituitary gland axis. Thyroid cancer (TC) and breast cancer (BC) are both sexually prevalent in women and both are affected by hormones, thus they are intrinsically linked. In addition, recent epidemiological surveys have found that, early metastasis and recurrence of breast cancer remain the main cause of survival in breast cancer patients. Although at home and abroad, studies have shown that new targeted anti-tumor drugs with numerous tumor markers are gradually being used in the clinic, evidence for potential molecular mechanisms affecting its prognosis lacks clinical studies. Therefore, we search the relevant literature, and based on the latest domestic and international consensus, review the molecular mechanisms and regulation relevance of circRNA, compare the difference of the same circRNA in two tumors, to more deeply understand and lay the foundation for future clinical diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic studies in large samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据