4.8 Article

Visual Object Tracking With Discriminative Filters and Siamese Networks: A Survey and Outlook

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3212594

关键词

Target tracking; Correlation; Object tracking; Feature extraction; Visualization; Benchmark testing; Training; Visual object tracking; discriminative correlation filters; siamese networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate and robust visual object tracking is a challenging problem in computer vision. This survey reviews more than 90 Discriminative Correlation Filters (DCFs) and Siamese trackers, based on results in nine tracking benchmarks. It presents the background theory, research challenges, and performance analysis of both DCFs and Siamese trackers, and provides recommendations for future research.
Accurate and robust visual object tracking is one of the most challenging and fundamental computer vision problems. It entails estimating the trajectory of the target in an image sequence, given only its initial location, and segmentation, or its rough approximation in the form of a bounding box. Discriminative Correlation Filters (DCFs) and deep Siamese Networks (SNs) have emerged as dominating tracking paradigms, which have led to significant progress. Following the rapid evolution of visual object tracking in the last decade, this survey presents a systematic and thorough review of more than 90 DCFs and Siamese trackers, based on results in nine tracking benchmarks. First, we present the background theory of both the DCF and Siamese tracking core formulations. Then, we distinguish and comprehensively review the shared as well as specific open research challenges in both these tracking paradigms. Furthermore, we thoroughly analyze the performance of DCF and Siamese trackers on nine benchmarks, covering different experimental aspects of visual tracking: datasets, evaluation metrics, performance, and speed comparisons. We finish the survey by presenting recommendations and suggestions for distinguished open challenges based on our analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据