4.8 Article

Generating Hypergraph-Based High-Order Representations of Whole-Slide Histopathological Images for Survival Prediction

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3209652

关键词

Correlation; Feature extraction; Data models; Predictive models; Convolution; Pathology; Task analysis; High-Order representation; hypergraph learning; survival prediction; whole slide image

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a multi-hypergraph based learning framework called HGSurvNet, which achieves an effective high-order global representation of WSIs for patient survival prediction. Extensive validation experiments demonstrate its superiority over state-of-the-art methods.
Patient survival prediction based on gigapixel whole-slide histopathological images (WSIs) has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. A key challenge of this task is achieving an informative survival-specific global representation from those WSIs with highly complicated data correlation. This article proposes a multi-hypergraph based learning framework, called HGSurvNet, to tackle this challenge. HGSurvNet achieves an effective high-order global representation of WSIs via multilateral correlation modeling in multiple spaces and a general hypergraph convolution network. It has the ability to alleviate over-fitting issues caused by the lack of training data by using a new convolution structure called hypergraph max-mask convolution. Extensive validation experiments were conducted on three widely-used carcinoma datasets: Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LUSC), Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), and National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). Quantitative analysis demonstrated that the proposed method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, coupled with the Bayesian Concordance Readjust loss. We also demonstrate the individual effectiveness of each module of the proposed framework and its application potential for pathology diagnosis and reporting empowered by its interpretability potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据