4.5 Article

Study on tensile properties of compression SOCKS ankle cut-strips at practical extension

期刊

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL TEXTILES
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15280837231170305

关键词

Tensile characterization; cut-strips; ankle; compression pressure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compression pressure exertion is important for compression socks and can be influenced by materials and machine adjustments. These socks work by applying the highest pressure at the ankle and gradually decreasing it towards the calf. They are used for preventing and treating venous disorders, ranging from minor valve incompetence to chronic ulcers. The tensile characteristics of compression socks directly impact their productivity, effectiveness, and working life.
Compression pressure exertion is strongly related to mechanical properties of compression socks deployed with various type of materials and machine adjustments. These socks work on the principle of highest pressure at the ankle and gradually decrease towards the calf portion. Compression socks are used for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous disorders. Venous disorders range from minor asymptomatic incompetence of venous valves to chronic venous ulceration. Current research work contains analysis of the force at practical extension compared to experimental pressure (Ps), the relationship between experimental pressure (Ps), force at practical extension, and tensile indices which include hysteresis (H), tensile resilience (TR), and tensile linearity (TL). Results showed that the force value at practical extension (F-L) impart the significant influence on experimental pressure (Ps). It is also portrayed that the tensile indices (W, W ', H, TR, and TL) combined with force at practical and experimental pressure also shown to have contributed significantly to the explanation of experimental pressure (Ps) results. Compression sock tensile characteristics are highly significant and directly related to their productivity, effectiveness, and working life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据