4.5 Article

Calcium distribution patterns of the aortic valve as a risk factor for the need of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 1385-1393

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev343

关键词

transcatheter aortic valve implantation; pacemaker; calcium distribution; simulation; 3D printing

资金

  1. ADUMED-Stiftung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims New-onset conduction disturbances still represent a considerable problem after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to identify calcification patterns with an elevated risk for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after TAVI and investigate underlying mechanisms in an ex vivo setting. Methods and results One hundred and sixty-two patients who underwent TAVI with the Edwards SAPIEN XT (R) or Medtronic CoreValve (R) at our institution were analysed. The calcium load of the device landing zone was quantified with 3mensio (R), and calcium patterns with an elevated risk for PPI were identified. Ex vivo simulations of balloon valvuloplasty were performed in 3D-printed silicone annuli of patients matching the identified risk profile. Patients with a calcium load of the left coronary cusp (LCC) above 209 mm(3) had a higher rate of PPI than patients below this threshold (16.7 vs. 2.6%, P = 0.003). Multivariate regression revealed pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) and increased LCC calcification as independent predictors for PPI. Simulation of the TAVI procedure in a silicone annulus revealed an off-centreline shift of the valvuloplasty balloon and transcatheter heart valve away from the LCC towards the commissure between right- and non-coronary cusp. Conclusion Pre-existing RBBB and elevated LCC calcification were identified as independent predictors for PPI. These two risk factors enabled us to distinguish between patients according to their risk for PPI after TAVI. Ex vivo simulations suggested an off-centreline shift of the balloon as a possible explanation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据