4.6 Article

Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless phase transition with Rabi-coupled bosons

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 107, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.L041302

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We theoretically investigate the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in a binary mixture of bosonic atoms with Rabi coupling. The transition temperature shows a nonmonotonic behavior with respect to the intercomponent coupling and an amplification for finite Rabi coupling. By developing the Nelson-Kosterlitz renormalization-group equations, we clarify the dependence of the transition temperature on the Rabi coupling and the intercomponent coupling. Our results contribute to the understanding of multicomponent quantum systems, such as multiband superconductors.
We theoretically investigate the superfluid-normal-state Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in a binary mixture of bosonic atoms with Rabi coupling under balanced densities. We find the nonmonotonic behavior of the transition temperature with respect to the intercomponent coupling and amplification of the transition temperature for finite values of Rabi coupling, but for small intracomponent couplings. We develop the Nelson-Kosterlitz renormalization-group equations in the two-component Bose mixture and obtain the Nelson-Kosterlitz criterion modified by a fractional parameter, which is responsible for half-integer vortices, and by Rabi coupling. Adopting the renormalization-group approach, we clarify the dependence of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition temperature on the Rabi coupling and the intercomponent coupling. Analysis of the first and second sound velocities also reveals the suppression of quasicrossing of the two sound modes with a finite Rabi coupling in the low-temperature regime. Our results for a two-dimensional binary Bose superfluid contribute to the understanding of a broad range of multicomponent quantum systems such as two-dimensional multiband superconductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据