4.6 Article

Equilibrium current distributions and W∞ gauge theory in quantum Hall systems of conventional electrons and Dirac electrons

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 107, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.165410

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In equilibrium planer systems of Hall electrons, two species of current counterflowing along the system edges are observed, as recently observed in experiments using a nanoscale magnetometer. The origins and features of these equilibrium currents are examined, considering the Coulombic many-body effects, and their real-space distributions are derived. The analysis is based on a reformulation of quantum Hall systems as a W-infinity gauge theory, allowing for diagonalization of the total Hamiltonian based onexternal probes' resolutions. These equilibrium currents are closely related to the orbital magnetization in quantum Hall systems, with a special focus on the case of graphene and its neutral (nu = 0) ground state and intrinsic diamagnetic response.
In equilibrium planer systems of Hall electrons, such as GaAs heterostructures and graphene, support two species of current counterflowing along the system edges, as observed recently in experiment using a nanoscale magnetometer. We examine distinct origins and distinctive features of these equilibrium currents, with the Coulombic many-body effects taken into account, and derive their real-space distributions. Our basic tool of analysis is a reformulation of quantum Hall systems as a W-infinity gauge theory, which allows one to diagonalize the total Hamiltonian according to the resolutions of external probes. These equilibrium currents are deeply tied to the orbital magnetization in quantum Hall systems. Special attention is drawn to the case of graphene, especially the neutral (nu = 0) ground state and its intrinsic diamagnetic response that combines with the equilibrium currents to govern the orbital magnetization and its oscillations with filling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据