4.7 Article

Determination of the top-quark mass from top-quark pair events with the matrix element method at next-to-leading order: Potential and prospects

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 107, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.076013

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 2004, the matrix element method was used by the D/0 experiment at the Tevatron to determine the top-quark mass, and it has since become a powerful analysis tool. This article explores the potential of using the matrix element method at NLO to determine the top-quark mass using pair-produced top quark events. The study finds that the NLO accuracy significantly reduces theoretical uncertainties compared to leading order.
In 2004 the matrix element method was used in a pioneering work by the Tevatron experiment D/0 to determine the top-quark mass from a handful of events. Since then the method has matured into a powerful analysis tool. While the first applications were restricted to leading-order accuracy, the extension to next-toleading order (NLO) accuracy has also been studied. In this article we explore the potential of the matrix element method at NLO to determine the top-quark mass using events with pair-produced top quarks. We simulate a toy experiment by generating unweighted events with a fixed input mass and apply the matrix element method to construct an estimator for the top-quark mass. Two different setups are investigated; unweighted events obtained from the fixed-order cross section at NLO accuracy as well as events obtained using POWHEG matched to a parton shower. The latter lead to a more realistic simulation and allow to study the impact of higher-order corrections as well as the robustness of the approach. We find that the matrix element method in NLO accuracy leads to a significant reduction of the theoretical uncertainties compared to leading order. In view of the high-luminosity phase of the LHC, this observation is especially relevant in analyses which are no longer dominated by statistical uncertainties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据