4.7 Article

Redshift evolution of cosmic birefringence in CMB anisotropies

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 =107, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.083529

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the impact of a cosmological redshift-dependent pseudoscalar field on the rotation of cosmic microwave background linear polarization. It is found that the redshift dependence leads to multipole dependence in the polarization and temperature-polarization power spectra. Taking this into account, we calculate the parameters of the redshift dependencies that can be detected by future CMB polarization experiments.
We study the imprints of a cosmological redshift-dependent pseudoscalar field phi on the rotation of cosmic microwave background (CMB) linear polarization generated by a coupling phi F mu nu F similar to mu nu. We show how either phenomenological or theoretically motivated redshift dependence of the pseudoscalar field, such as those in models of early dark energy, quintessence, or axionlike dark matter, lead to CMB polarization and temperature-polarization power spectra which exhibit a multipole dependence which goes beyond the widely adopted approximation in which the redshift dependence of the linear polarization angle is neglected. Because of this multipole dependence, the isotropic birefringence effect due to a general coupling phi F mu nu F similar to mu nu is not degenerate with a systematic calibration angle uncertainty. By taking this multipole dependence into account, we calculate the parameters of these phenomenological and theoretical redshift dependencies of the pseudoscalar field which can be detected by future CMB polarization experiments on the basis of a chi 2 analysis for a Wishart likelihood. As a final example of our approach, we compute by Markov chain Monte Carlo the minimal coupling g phi in early dark energy which could be detected by future experiments, with or without marginalizing on a systematic rotation angle uncertainty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据