4.7 Review

Association between Dysbiosis in the Gut Microbiota of Primary Osteoporosis Patients and Bone Loss

期刊

AGING AND DISEASE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

INT SOC AGING & DISEASE
DOI: 10.14336/AD.2023.0425

关键词

Next-Generation-sequencing; microbiome; 16SrRNA; dysbiosis; aging; osteoporosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent decades, research on gut microbiome has grown significantly due to technological advances. Age, diet, and living environment are key factors influencing gut microbes and dysbiosis can impact bone health by altering bacterial metabolites. Restoring a healthy microbiome signature could reduce bone loss associated with osteoporosis or spaceflight. However, current research faces challenges such as contradictory findings and insufficient sample sizes.
In recent decades, gut microbiome research has experienced significant growth, driven by technological advances that enable quantifying bacterial taxa with greater precision. Age, diet, and living environment have emerged as three key factors influencing gut microbes. Dysbiosis, resulting from alterations in these factors, may lead to changes in bacterial metabolites that regulate pro-and anti-inflammatory processes and consequently impact bone health. Restoration of a healthy microbiome signature could mitigate inflammation and potentially reduce bone loss associated with osteoporosis or experienced by astronauts during spaceflight. However, current research is hindered by contradictory findings, insufficient sample sizes, and inconsistency in experimental conditions and controls. Despite progress in sequencing technology, defining a healthy gut microbiome across global populations remains elusive. Challenges persist in identifying accurate gut bacterial metabolics, specific taxa, and their effects on host physiology. We suggest greater attention be directed towards this issue in Western countries as the cost of treating osteoporosis in the United States reaches billions of dollars annually, with expenses projected to continue rising.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据