4.5 Review

Lithium-ion battery recycling: a source of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to the environment?

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 1015-1030

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2em00511e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recycling of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is vital for meeting the increasing demand for metals and achieving a sustainable circular economy. However, there is limited knowledge about the environmental risks associated with LIB recycling, particularly the emission of persistent fluorinated substances. This study provides an overview of the use of fluorinated substances in LIBs and highlights the potential formation and release of persistent fluorinated substances during the recycling process. It calls for further investigation and suggests the substitution of PFAS-based materials or changes in process conditions to prevent the formation and emission of persistent fluorinated substances.
Recycling of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is a rapidly growing industry, which is vital to address the increasing demand for metals, and to achieve a sustainable circular economy. Relatively little information is known about the environmental risks posed by LIB recycling, in particular with regards to the emission of persistent (in)organic fluorinated chemicals. Here we present an overview on the use of fluorinated substances - in particular per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) - in state-of-the-art LIBs, along with recycling conditions which may lead to their formation and/or release to the environment. Both organic and inorganic fluorinated substances are widely reported in LIB components, including the electrodes and binder, electrolyte (and additives), and separator. Among the most common substances are LiPF6 (an electrolyte salt), and the polymeric PFAS polyvinylidene fluoride (used as an electrode binder and a separator). Currently the most common LIB recycling process involves pyrometallurgy, which operates at high temperatures (up to 1600 degrees C), sufficient for PFAS mineralization. However, hydrometallurgy, an increasingly popular alternative recycling approach, operates under milder temperatures (<600 degrees C), which could favor incomplete degradation and/or formation and release of persistent fluorinated substances. This is supported by the wide range of fluorinated substances detected in bench-scale LIB recycling experiments. Overall, this review highlights the need to further investigate emissions of fluorinated substances during LIB recycling and suggests that substitution of PFAS-based materials (i.e. during manufacturing), or alternatively post-treatments and/or changes in process conditions may be required to avoid formation and emission of persistent fluorinated substances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据