4.2 Article

Characterization of GaN structures for power electronics by secondary ion mass spectrometry and atomic force microscope approach

期刊

出版社

A V S AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1116/6.0002573

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This scientific paper presents a chemical study on different Al2O3/GaN interfaces found in high electron mobility transistors for power electronics. The objective is to overcome the limitation of an oxidized gallium layer that affects the electrical behavior of the semiconductor. The structures were analyzed using ToF-SIMS, M-SIMS, and AFM techniques, and the best experimental conditions were determined.
This scientific paper describes the chemical study of different Al2O3/GaN interfaces found in the new generation of high electron mobility transistors developed for power electronics applications. The stake for these interfaces is the limitation, ideally the absence of an oxidized gallium layer hampering the good electrical behavior of the semiconductor. These structures have been studied through time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS), magnetic SIMS (M-SIMS), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) analyses. Two structures were considered: a bilayer Al2O3 10 nm-GaOx 2 nm on GaN and a Al2O3 10 nm single layer deposited on preliminary etched GaN. The first sample was used as a dedicated reference sample where an actual gallium oxide layer was grown, whereas the second one was a technologically relevant structure. Several experimental conditions were compared for the ToF- and M-SIMS analyses; in particular, three angles of incidence for the primary Cs+ sputter beam (65(?)degrees, 61(?)degrees, 45(?)degrees) were used, leading to diverse depth resolutions and roughnesses, as revealed by surface topography analysis provided by AFM. Among the different incidence angles, it was found that the best experimental conditions were those obtained by ToF-SIMS analysis with an incidence angle of 45(?)degrees, generating the least roughness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据