4.6 Article

Favorable morphology and compositional distribution enable efficient and stable quasi-2D Dion-Jacobson perovskite solar cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 11377-11387

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta09940c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, two novel organic cations MDAN and EDAN were used to create quasi-2D DJ perovskites. The EDAN-based perovskite showed better film morphology and lower defect density, resulting in a higher power conversion efficiency.
Two-dimensional (2D) Dion-Jacobson (DJ) halide perovskites are being intensively investigated owing to their superior stability compared with 2D Ruddlesden-Popper (RP) perovskites. Although various organic cations have been reported to form 2D DJ perovskites, their structure-property relationships are rarely studied. In this work, two novel organic cations MDAN (4,4 '-methylenedianilinium) and EDAN (4,4 '-ethylenedianilinium) were applied to form quasi-2D DJ perovskites with nominal layer number n = 6. An (EDAN)MA(5)Pb(6)I(19):0.15MACl based inverted solar cell achieved a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 13.2%, outperforms the 9.6% PCE achieved by a (MDAN)MA(5)Pb(6)I(19):0.15MACl based device. The formation of quasi-2D perovskites with high-n values was observed for both compounds, while the superior performance is demonstrated by the (EDAN)MA(5)Pb(6)I(19):0.15MACl based device, which could be attributed to its better film morphology and lower defect density. Intriguingly, we found that EDAN based quasi-2D perovskites were evenly distributed in the film while MDAN based quasi-2D perovskites concentrated near the film surface, accounting for an unfavorable electronic band alignment of the latter. Both (MDAN/EDAN)MA(5)Pb(6)I(19):0.15MACl films remained unchanged in air with 50% relative humidity for 20 days. This work not only presents a decent device performance, but also explores understanding of tuning morphology towards high-efficiency quasi-2D Dion-Jacobson perovskite solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据