4.6 Review

Molecular design and coordination regulation of atomically dispersed bi-functional catalysts for oxygen electrocatalysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 11089-11118

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta09788e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper illustrates the relationship between the structure and multifunctional performance of mono-disperse catalysts using reversible oxygen electrocatalysis as an example. The progress in carbon-based and non-carbon-based mono-disperse catalysts is reviewed, and the prospects and challenges of mono-disperse catalysts for multifunctional electrocatalytic reactions are discussed.
The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) play important roles in new sustainable energy conversion devices to address the dilemma of energy shortage, but are limited by slow electrochemical kinetic processes. Atomically dispersed catalysts (ADCs) with maximized utilization and well-defined configurations point the way to design efficient and cost-effective multifunctional electrocatalysts. In this paper, we illustrate the relationship between the structure and multifunctional performance of mono-disperse catalysts using reversible oxygen electrocatalysis as an example. Significantly, carbon materials and metal compounds are described as equally important substrate materials. For carbon-based mono-disperse catalysts, the realization of atomic metal sites on carbon supports and the regulation of intrinsic activity are reviewed from the following aspects: molecular design (including substrate design and selection of a center metal atom) and coordination environment. Besides, the substrates of non-carbon-based mono-disperse catalysts are divided into metal oxides, sulfides and carbides/nitrides, and the catalytic mechanism and regulation methods are described. Finally, the prospects and challenges of mono-disperse catalysts for multifunctional electrocatalytic reactions are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据