Psychometric properties of the online Satisfaction with Life Scale in university students from a low-income region

PurposeTo test the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in an online format in university students from a low-income region.MethodsThis was a psychometric study, involving a study of reliability (n = 117) and validity (n = 195) in university students from a region with a Gini index of 0.56. The scale was applied at two time points with an interval of 2 weeks. This scale measures satisfaction with life based on five statements and responses ranging from 1 to 7 (strongly disagree to strongly agree). We conducted the reliability assessment using temporal stability and internal consistency and construct validity assessment by internal structure solution.ResultsAll SWLS items showed acceptable (rho > 0.30) and significant (p < 0.05) temporal stability and acceptable internal consistency (alpha > 0.70). In construct validity (internal structure), we identified a factor with an explained variance of 59.0% in the exploratory factor analysis. Additionally, in the confirmatory factor analysis, we identified a one-factor structure solution for SWLS with an acceptable model fitting (chi-square/degrees of freedom [X-2/df] = 6.53; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.991; Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.996; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.040; standardized root mean-squared residual [SRMR] = 0.026).ConclusionThe Satisfaction with Life Scale, in the online format, is a reliable and valid tool for university students in a low-income context.

Automated summary

This study aimed to test the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in an online format among university students from a low-income region. The results showed that the scale demonstrated acceptable temporal stability, internal consistency, and construct validity, indicating that it is a reliable and valid tool for measuring life satisfaction in this context.