4.2 Article

Benchmarks of generalized hydrodynamics for one-dimensional Bose gases

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L022024

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Generalized hydrodynamics (GHD) is a theoretical approach used to characterize non-equilibrium phenomena in integrable and near-integrable quantum many-body systems. In this study, we compare its performance with alternative theoretical methods in describing an interacting one-dimensional Bose gas described by the Lieb-Liniger model. We find that GHD performs well at high temperatures or strong interactions, but for low temperatures and weak interactions, it can still provide a coarse-grained description based on convolution averaging that mimics finite imaging resolution in ultracold atom experiments.
Generalized hydrodynamics (GHD) is a recent theoretical approach that is becoming a go-to tool for charac-terizing out-of-equilibrium phenomena in integrable and near-integrable quantum many-body systems. Here, we benchmark its performance against an array of alternative theoretical methods, for an interacting one-dimensional Bose gas described by the Lieb-Liniger model. In particular, we study various quantum shock wave scenarios, along with a quantum Newton's cradle setup, for various interaction strengths and initial temperatures. We find that GHD generally performs very well at sufficiently high temperatures or strong interactions. For low temperatures and weak interactions, we highlight situations where GHD, while not capturing interference phenomena on short lengthscales, can describe a coarse-grained behavior based on convolution averaging that mimics finite imaging resolution in ultracold atom experiments. In a quantum Newton's cradle setup based on a double-well to a single-well trap quench, we find that GHD with diffusive corrections demonstrates excellent agreement with the predictions of a classical field approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据