4.1 Article

Portfolio of distribution maps for Octopus vulgaris off Mauritania

期刊

AQUATIC LIVING RESOURCES
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/alr/2023008

关键词

Spatiotemporal distribution data; Maps portfolio; temporal dynamics; Octopus vulgaris

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces the concept of portfolios of distribution maps, which consist of a reduced set of empirical orthogonal maps that best explain spatial biomass distributions of a given species over time. The approach is demonstrated using the distributions of common octopus off Mauritania over the last thirty years. The size of each portfolio represents the number of distinct spatial patterns describing octopus spatial distributions.
This study introduces the concept of portfolios of distribution maps, which consist of the reduced set of empirical orthogonal maps that best explain spatial biomass distributions of a given species over time. The approach is demonstrated for the distributions of common octopus (Octupus vulgaris) off Mauritania over the last thirty years. The maps in the portfolio are the subset of empirical orthogonal maps that allowed to recover 60% of the spatiotemporal biomass distribution variance and whose temporal weights were significantly correlated with abundance. For octopus during the hot season, one single map explained half of the overall variance of the distribution data, while during the cold season, the portfolio of octopus distribution maps consisted of four maps, with the temporal weights of the second map being negatively correlated with upwelling intensity six months before. The size of each portfolio represents the number of distinct spatial patterns describing octopus spatial distributions. Assuming that specific but hidden processes explain each biomass spatial distribution of the portfolio, the size of a map portfolio might be interpreted as a proxy for system resilience. A small portfolio could reflect systems that are more fragile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据