4.7 Article

Did the Covid-19 restrictions influence land surface temperatures in Southeast Asia? A study from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 25, 页码 66812-66821

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26892-8

关键词

Land surface temperatures (LST); Urban heat island (UHI); Urban remote sensing; Urban sprawl

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There was a prolonged lockdown and reduction in human activities during the Covid-19 pandemic period, which led to a significant reduction in land surface temperatures in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. This reduction was in agreement with the decrease in greenhouse gases observed during the same period. However, the land surface temperatures have increased since the lifting of the lockdown measures in November 2021.
There have been a prolonged lockdown period and reduction in human activities in most of the major cities in the world during the Covid-19 pandemic period between the early 2020 and the late 2021. Such a reduction in human activities was believed to have influenced pollution levels and land surface temperatures (LST) in urban areas. This paper describes the variations in LSTs before, during and after the Covid-19 lockdown in Ho Chi Minh City in southern Vietnam, which is the economic hub of the country. For this purpose, Landsat-8 OLI and TIRS images acquired between 2015 and 2022 were used. It is observed that there was a significant reduction of 1 to 1.8 degrees C in LST in open areas, excepting impervious surfaces and built-up areas, during the strict lockdown period in Ho Chi Minh City, and an increase in LST since then. The observed reduction in LST during the lockdown period in Ho Chi Minh City is in agreement with the reduction in greenhouses gases during the same period in recent studies. Human mobility and industrial activities have been restored in November 2021 in the study area which would explain the regain in LST in the post-lockdown period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据