4.7 Review

The Apelinergic System in Pregnancy

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24098014

关键词

apelin; Elabela; APJ; placenta; pregnancy; preeclampsia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The apelinergic system is a highly conserved pleiotropic system that plays important roles in pregnancy and placenta-related complications. It is involved in the regulation of the adipoinsular axis, cardiovascular and central nervous systems, carcinogenesis, and embryo cardiogenesis and vasculogenesis during pregnancy. However, there are inconsistencies in the expression and circulating levels of its components in human placenta-associated preeclampsia.
The apelinergic system is a highly conserved pleiotropic system. It comprises the apelin receptor apelin peptide jejunum (APJ) and its two peptide ligands, Elabela/Toddler (ELA) and apelin, which have different spatiotemporal localizations. This system has been implicated in the regulation of the adipoinsular axis, in cardiovascular and central nervous systems, in carcinogenesis, and in pregnancy in humans. During pregnancy, the apelinergic system is essential for embryo cardiogenesis and vasculogenesis and for placental development and function. It may also play a role in the initiation of labor. The apelinergic system seems to be involved in the development of placenta-related pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia (PE) and intrauterine growth restriction, but an improvement in PE-like symptoms and birth weight has been described in murine models after the exogenous administration of apelin or ELA. Although the expression of ELA, apelin, and APJ is altered in human PE placenta, data related to their circulating levels are inconsistent. This article reviews current knowledge about the roles of the apelinergic system in pregnancy and its pathophysiological roles in placenta-related complications in pregnancy. We also discuss the challenges in translating the actors of the apelinergic system into a marker or target for therapeutic interventions in obstetrics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据