4.8 Review

Organelle-targeting ratiometric fluorescent probes: design principles, detection mechanisms, bio-applications, and challenges

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 14, 期 22, 页码 5842-5871

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3sc01036h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biological species, such as ROS, RSS, RNS, F-, Pd2+, Cu2+, Hg2+, play vital roles in cellular functions but their abnormal concentrations can lead to serious diseases. Monitoring these species in cellular organelles is crucial. Ratiometric fluorescent probes have gained attention as a potential solution, offering increased sensitivity by measuring intensity changes in two emission bands caused by the analyte. This review article discusses publications (2015-2022) on organelle-targeting ratiometric fluorescent probes, including strategies, mechanisms, scope, and challenges.
Biological species, including reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive sulfur species (RSS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), F-, Pd2+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and others, are crucial for the healthy functioning of cells in living organisms. However, their aberrant concentration can result in various serious diseases. Therefore, it is essential to monitor biological species in cellular organelles such as the cell membrane, mitochondria, lysosome, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, and nucleus. Among various fluorescent probes for species detection within the organelles, ratiometric fluorescent probes have drawn special attention as a potential way to get beyond the drawbacks of intensity-based probes. This method depends on measuring the intensity change of two emission bands (caused by an analyte), which produces an efficient internal referencing that increases the detection's sensitivity. This review article discusses the literature publications (from 2015 to 2022) on organelle-targeting ratiometric fluorescent probes, the general strategies, the detecting mechanisms, the broad scope, and the challenges currently faced by fluorescent probes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据