4.7 Article

Gildener-Weinberg two-Higgs-doublet model at two loops

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 107, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.075038

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Gildener-Weinberg two-Higgs doublet model provides a light and aligned Higgs boson. The model's beyond the Standard Model Higgs bosons are bounded by a sum rule. H alignment is confirmed by two loop calculations, which also give similar results as the one-loop approximation.
The Gildener-Weinberg two-Higgs doublet model provides a naturally light and aligned Higgs boson, H 1/4 Ho125 + . It has been studied in the one-loop approximation of its effective potential, V-1. An important consequence is that the masses of the model's beyond the Standard Model (BSM) Higgs bosons (H'; A;H-+/-) are bounded by the sum rule (M-H'(4) + M-A(4) + 2M(H +/-)(4))(1/4) = 540 GeV. Although they are well within reach of the LHC, searches for them have been stymied by large QCD backgrounds. Another consequence is that H is highly aligned, i.e., H-H' mixing is small and H has only Standard Model couplings. A corollary of this alignment is that commonly pursued discovery modes such as H', A <-> W+W-, ZZ, HZ, and H +/- <-> W(+/-)Z, (WH)-H-+/- are beyond the reach of LHC experiments. To assess the accuracy of the sum rule and Higgs alignment, we study this model in two loops. This calculation is complicated by having many new contributions. We present two formulations of it to calculate the H-H' mass matrix, its eigenvectors H-1, H-2, and the mass M-H2 while fixing M-H1 = 125 GeV. They give similar results and are in accord with the one-loop results. Requiring M-A = MH +/-, we find 180 GeV less than or similar to M-A;H +/- less than or similar to 380-425 GeV and 550-700 GeV greater than or similar to M-H2 greater than or similar to 125 GeV, with M-H2 decreasing as M-A;H +/- increase. The corrections to H alignment are below O(1%) . So, the BSM searches above will remain fruitless. Finding the BSM Higgses requires improved sensitivity to their low masses. We discuss three possible searches for this.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据