4.5 Article

Visual performance of single vision and multifocal contact lenses in non-presbyopic myopic eyes

期刊

CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 38-46

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2015.07.005

关键词

Myopia; Multifocal contact lenses; Visual performance; Single vision contact lenses

资金

  1. Brien Holden Vision Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To assess visual performance of single vision and multifocal soft contact lenses. Methods: At baseline, forty-four myopic participants (aged 18-35 years) were fitted bilaterally with a control lens (AirOptix Aqua). At the four follow-up visits, a total of 16 study lenses (5 single vision, 11 multifocal lenses) were fitted contralaterally. After 1 h of lens wear, participants rated (scale 1-10) vision clarity (distance, intermediate and near), magnitude of ghosting at distance, comfort during head movement, and overall comfort. Distance high contrast visual acuity (HCVA), central refraction and higher order aberrations, and contact lens centration were measured. Results: For single vision lenses, vision ratings were not significantly different to the control (p > 0.005). The control outperformed Acuvue Oasys, Clariti Monthly and Night and Day in HCVA (mean VA: -0.10 +/- 0.07 logMAR, p < 0.005). Most refraction and higher order aberration measures were not different between lenses. The Night and Day lens showed greatest differences compared to the control, i. e., C[4, 0] was more positive (p < 0.005) at distance (Delta = 0.019 mm) and near (Delta = 0.028 mm). For multifocal lenses, the majority of vision ratings (84%) were better with the control (p < 0.005). HCVA was better with the control (p < 0.005). Proclear Multifocal lenses showed greatest differences for M, C[3, -1] and C[4, 0] at distance and near, and were inferiorly de-centered (p < 0.005). Conclusion: Design differences between single vision lenses had a small impact on visual performance. Lenses featuring multifocality decreased visual performance, in particular when power variations across the optic zone were large and/or the lens was significantly de-centered. (C) 2015 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据