4.7 Article

Accurate determination of the shapes of granular charge distributions

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.107.034901

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments have shown that charge distributions of granular materials are non-Gaussian, indicating the presence of many highly charged particles. Measurement uncertainties account for the previously observed tail broadening, as distributions measured at different electric fields have different tail sizes. By accounting for uncertainties, the true charge distribution without broadening is found to be non-Gaussian, with fewer highly charged particles. These findings have implications for granular behavior in natural settings where electrostatic interactions play a role.
Experiments have shown that charge distributions of granular materials are non-Gaussian, with broad tails that indicate many particles with high charge. This observation has consequences for the behavior of granular materials in many settings, and may bear relevance to the underlying charge transfer mechanism. However, there is the unaddressed possibility that broad tails arise due to experimental uncertainties, as determining the shapes of tails is nontrivial. Here we show that measurement uncertainties can indeed account for most of the tail broadening previously observed. The clue that reveals this is that distributions are sensitive to the electric field at which they are measured; ones measured at low (high) fields have larger (smaller) tails. Accounting for sources of uncertainty, we reproduce this broadening in silico. Finally, we use our results to back out the true charge distribution without broadening, which we find is still non-Guassian, though with substantially different behavior at the tails and indicating significantly fewer highly charged particles. These results have implications in many natural settings where electrostatic interactions, especially among highly charged particles, strongly affect granular behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据