4.7 Article

A nationwide investigation of trace elements in rice and wheat flour in China: Levels, spatial distributions and implications for human exposure

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 30, 页码 75235-75246

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-27753-0

关键词

Trace element; Rice; Wheat flour; Estimated daily intake; Health risk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rises in trace element contents in rice and wheat flour in China, which are staple foods for the majority of the population, have raised concerns due to their potential health risks. This study assessed the concentrations of nine trace elements in rice and wheat flour samples from different regions in China and found significant regional differences. The results indicate that the levels of trace elements exceed safe limits, posing potential non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks to human health.
Rises in trace element contents in rice and wheat flour, which are staple foods for almost all the Chinese population, associated with rapid economic development have raised major concerns. This study aimed to assess trace element concentrations in these foods nationwide in China and associated human exposure risks. For these purposes, nine trace elements were measured in 260 rice samples and 181 wheat flour samples with 17 and 12 widely scattered geographical origins in China, respectively. Mean concentrations (mg kg(-1)) of the trace elements declined in the following orders: Zn > Cu > Ni > Pb > As > Cr > Cd > Se > Co in rice, and Zn > Cu > Ni > Se > Pb > Cr > Cd > As > Co in wheat flour. Significant regional differences in levels of trace elements in both rice and wheat flour were detected (p < 0.05), which may be related to local economic indicators. The hazard index (HI) of trace elements in rice samples from all origins exceeded 1, mainly due to the contribution of As, suggesting a potential non-carcinogenic risk. The total carcinogenic risk (TCR) for rice and wheat flour of all origins exceeded the safe level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据